I SEE PEOPLE ALL OVER ACT AS IF THEY ARE IMMUNE FROM THE USA, INC.’S ACTIONS AND THEY VOTE AS IF THEY DON’T CARE. ALL OF THIS DETACHED BEHAVIOR IS ABOUT TO GET A WAKE UP CALL AND IT WON’T BE A PRETTY ONE! NOTHING HAS EVER HIT OUR SHORES, SO EVERYONE IS IN DENIAL ABOUT POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES AND RAMIFICATIONS OF THIS ROUGE GOVERNMENT’S ACTIONS. WAIT FOR IT AS IT IS COMING!

 

The Republican Liberty Caucus condemns the U.S.-led military strikes on Iran as unconstitutional, citing Article I, Section 8, which grants war powers exclusively to Congress – not the president – and argues that no imminent threat justifying unilateral action has been demonstrated.

The group highlights a discrepancy in White House claims: If June 2025’s Operation Midnight Hammer successfully dismantled Iran’s nuclear program, the latest strikes lack justification. If not, Congress and the public deserve full transparency before further escalation.

The RLC warns that targeted strikes could spiral into a broader Middle East conflict, endangering U.S. troops and destabilizing the region – echoing past quagmires like Iraq and Afghanistan.

Urging a return to Trump’s first-term strategies, the RLC advocates direct negotiations with adversarial regimes and avoiding unnecessary military entanglements, while demanding a congressional war powers vote – a rare bipartisan point of agreement.

Trump is challenged to uphold his “no new wars” pledge, warning that abandoning restraint risks betraying his base and entangling his administration in the same globalist-driven conflicts he once criticized.
The Republican Liberty Caucus (RLC), a longstanding conservative group aligned with President Donald Trump’s “America First” foreign policy, has issued a sharp rebuke of recent U.S.-led military strikes on Iran conducted jointly with Israel.

In a statement released on Wednesday, March 4, the RLC warned that the operation risks escalating into a broader Middle East conflict while bypassing Congress’ constitutional authority to declare war. The group also cited the War Powers Resolution (WPR), which restricts unilateral military action to cases of imminent threat – a justification they argue has not been credibly demonstrated.

“The Constitution is unambiguous,” the RLC declared, emphasizing that Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution explicitly grants war powers to Congress – not the president. “The WPR further restricts unilateral executive military action to situations involving an imminent threat to the U.S. or a direct attack on American forces. No such imminent threat has been demonstrated.”

The group, which has historically supported Trump’s diplomatic restraint, argues that the strikes – justified as a response to Iran’s nuclear program – contradict the administration’s own claims that Tehran’s nuclear capabilities were already dismantled last year.

The White House has defended the strikes as necessary to counter the Islamic Republic’s nuclear ambitions. However, the RLC highlights a contradiction.

Last summer’s Operation Midnight Hammer was touted as successfully neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capabilities. If true, the RLC argues, the latest strikes lack justification. If false, Congress and the public deserve transparency before further military escalation.

“If [Operation Midnight Hammer] is not true, the American people deserve to know that – and Congress deserves a full accounting before American lives are put at risk,” the statement reads.