The US Department of Defense (US DoD) has had a dominant role in the response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and in the development, and distribution of the Covid 19 vaccines, a fact hidden from the general public. In those processes many standard steps and procedures, otherwise required for pharmaceutical products, were omitted or circumvented.

Definition of these vaccines as “countermeasures” rather than therapeutic agents has permitted their expedited progression to emergency use authorisation and widespread rollouts. Many adverse consequences have been the outcome of this secret military response to a public health matter. Why are governments around the world, including Australia, planning to make further significant investments in this rushed vaccine technology driven by the US military?

With the US Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorisation of the COVID-19 vaccines (FDA, 2020) and the Provisional Approval of the first COVID-19 vaccine in Australia (TGA, 2021), these agents were hailed as innovative life-saving responses by the pharmaceutical industry to a deadly global pandemic.  

The development, testing and drug regulatory approval of these novel COVID-19 gene-based vaccines using messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology was said to have been done in less than one year, whereas development and approval of conventional vaccines normally takes about 10 years. (Seneff and Nigh, 2021). The public was told that this was assisted by financial support of vaccine companies by the US government under Operation Warp Speed. 

The public was told that these COVID-19 gene-based vaccines were “safe and effective” (CDCa, 2022): that they would prevent infection and chances of serious illness and death from the virus, and would prevent transmission of the virus. We now know they do not prevent infection nor transmission and have not prevented a continuing high incidence of COVID-19. Furthermore they are associated with an unprecedented incidence of serious adverse events and deaths compared to any other drugs in the history of the pharmaceutical industry. (Turni and Lefringhausen 2022; Altman, 2022; CMN, 2022; Blaylock, 2022). 

Based on the US CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), there were 1,476,227 adverse event reports associated with these “vaccines” (CDCb, 2022).  through December 2, 2022, which include 32,621 reported deaths and 185,412 hospitalizations. Furthermore, a rise in unexplained deaths has been reported around the world coincident with their introduction. In Australia, up to August 2022 there were 18,671 excess deaths (17 percent) more than average, with most of these deaths not due to COVID-19 (ABS, 2022).  We are probably facing the worst health disaster in history.

How did the pharmaceutical industry, our governments and our drug regulators get it so wrong?  A plausible answer to this question has emerged within the last few weeks. 

Contrary to popular belief that pharmaceutical companies drove the COVID vaccine development programs, the US FDA’s website (FDA, 2020) reveals that the United States Department of Defence (DoD) has been in full control of the Covid Vaccine development program since its beginning. The DoD has been responsible for development, manufacturing, clinical trials, quality assurance, distribution and administration, since that time (FDA, 2020; Rees and Latypova, 2022; KEI, 2022; Medical Defense Consortium, 2022; Rees, 2022). The major pharmaceutical companies have been involved as “Project Coordination Teams” effectively performing as subcontractors to the DoD. The Chief Operating Officer for the Warp Speed vaccine program is the US Department of Defence, and the Chief Science Advisor is the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

Messenger RNA platform technology has been researched by DARPA (Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency) since at least 2012 (McCullough, 2022).  In early 2020, in the panic to develop the COVID-19 vaccines, certain critical research and development procedures were omitted, bypassed, curtailed, or not done in a logical sequential manner, or to established laboratory or manufacturing standards. Although the spike protein is the active drug and is directly responsible for the immune response, its pharmacology and toxicology have not been studied in animals or in humans as would normally have been required. 

Key legislative elements enable the US government to authorise, fund, contract and control many DoD research programs, as follows: 

• the Emergency Use Authorisation regulations (1997) allow, in cases of emergency, a new drug to be made available with less supportive safety and efficacy data than normally required for full approval. 
• the Other Transaction Authority regulations (2015) permit contractual transactions that are not required to comply with Federal laws and regulations, and
• the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act 2020) establishes limited liability for the companies involved in the contract arrangements with the DoD.

Two US DoD agencies, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), possess considerable resources for research, development and approval for various products. They also contract with a large number of companies for such functions. 

The products of these programs, including the COVID-19 vaccines, are sometimes classified as “countermeasures,” “prototypes,” or “demonstrations” rather than pharmaceutical products. Those labels permit a product to avoid lengthy conventional regulatory, commercial development and testing pathways normally required for pharmaceutical products (ICH, 2022) and to proceed to Emergency Use Authorization.   

 The answer appears to be that, in the interest of national security, the US DoD took charge of the Covid vaccine funding, development and testing from the very start of the perceived threat in early 2020. In the early panic, normal prudent quality, safety and efficacy considerations were compromised. Drug regulators played, and continue to play, an acquiescent role in approving and endorsing these vaccines. We now see this was a mistake. Many are now of the opinion that the Covid vaccines appear to have done more harm than good (Dopp and Seneff, 2022). Uncovering the truth has been a slow and arduous process, which has been exacerbated by the intense and unprecedented censorship of doctors and scientists, which continues to this day.  

April 14th 2020 DOD Continues Global Military To Battle COVID-19 https://www.jcs.mil/Media/News/News-Display/Article/2151204/dod-continues-global-military-operations-even-as-it-battles-covid-19/

April 28th 2020 NATO Coronavirus response: Military Medical Unit supports EUFOR with preventive testing https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_175510.htm

May 15th 2020 Army General to Co-Lead ‘Operation Warp Speed’ for COVID-19 Vaccine https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2188680/army-general-to-co-lead-operation-warp-speed-for-covid-19-vaccine/

June 3rd 2020 Operation COVID-19. Why did Whitehall turn to Military Planners? https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/operation-covid-19/

October 19th 2020 DOMESTIC MILITARY OPERATIONS AND THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC https://jnslp.com/2020/10/19/domestic-military-operations-and-the-coronavirus-pandemic/

July 14th 2021 December 28th 2019; Covid Hoax Starts December 27th 2018; Covid Vaccines using “Vaccinology” are manufactured with computer software and produced at CERN. The CRISPR gene editing technique continues to create a buzz in the … Collider at CERN (the European Organisation for Nuclear Research). https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/nurembergtrialsnet-covid-19-hoax-news-july-7th-to-14th-ft-cern?blogcategory=Trust+the+Science

March 29th 2022 After two years, the final US military medical Covid-19 deployments are ending: ‘We still have a long road ahead’ https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/29/health/covid-military-medical-deployment-ends/index.html

BY RHODA WILSON ON JANUARY 8, 2023 • ( 4 COMMENTS )

New documents reveal the US Department of Defence (“DoD”) controlled the Covid programme from the start, the military’s investigative newspaper Armed Forces Press has said. The US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) vaccine approval process was theatre. Covid injections are “medical countermeasures” – a grey area of products that are not regulated as vaccines or medicines.

Under the Public Health Emergency, medical countermeasures are not regulated or safeguarded as pharmaceutical products. The American people were led to believe that the FDA, Centres for Disease Control (“CDC”), and figureheads like Anthony Fauci oversaw the Covid-19 vaccine program. But all decisions concerning the Covid-19 vaccine research, materials acquisition, distribution, and information sharing were tightly controlled by the DoD.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

TYPE YOUR EMAIL…

SUBSCRIBE

A combination of the PREP Act, Emergency Use Authorisation (“EUA”) and Other Transactions Authority (“OTA”) Shielded Big Pharma, Agencies, and Medical Participants that Delivered Unregulated Vaccines from Any Liability.

According to congressionally passed statutes, research of active laws, and extra details obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Department of Defence owns, implements, and oversees the Covid-19 vaccine program as a “Countermeasure” to foreign attack. While the public was bombarded with an orchestrated fear campaign, the US Government managed the Covid response as a national security threat.

The research and documents were obtained by a former executive of a pharmaceutical Contract Research Organisation (“CRO”), Sasha Latypova, and intensive legal researcher Katherine Watt.

[Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea has published more detail on the research conducted by Latypova HERE.]

The undercover operation was orchestrated utilising three critical legal manoeuvres:

1. Emergency Use Authorisation (“EUA”)
2. PREP Act
3. Other Transactions Authority

President Trump declared a Public Health Emergency (“PHE”) on 13 March 13 2020, under the Stafford Act, putting the National Security Council in charge of the Covid policy. Covid-19 vaccines are “medical countermeasures” – a grey area of products that are not regulated as vaccines or medicines.

“They put the National Security Council in charge and treated it as an act of war,” said Latypova.

According to Operation Warp Speed/ASPR reports, the DoD ordered, oversaw, and tightly managed the development, manufacture, and distribution of Covid countermeasures, mainly utilising the DoD’s previously established network of military contractors and consortia.

The DoD, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”), and Health and Human Services (“HHS”) ordered all Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines” as prototype demonstrations of large-scale manufacturing, avoiding regulations and transparency under OTA. As prototypes used under EUA during PHE, Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines,” need not comply with the US laws for manufacturing quality, safety, and labelling.

“The implication is that the US Government authorised and funded the deployment of noncompliant biological materials on Americans without clarifying their “prototype” legal status, making the materials not subject to normal regulatory oversight, all while maintaining a fraudulent pseudo “regulatory” presentation to the public,” said Latypova.“Most incredible is the fact that current Laws enacted by the United States Congress appear to make the coverup actions LEGAL!”

Under the PHE, medical countermeasures are not regulated or safeguarded as pharmaceutical products (21 USC 360bbb-3(k).

The American people were led to believe that the FDA, CDC, and figureheads like Anthony Fauci oversaw the Covid-19 vaccine program. Their involvement was an orchestrated information operation. All decisions concerning the Covid-19 vaccine research, materials acquisition, distribution, and information sharing were tightly controlled by the DoD.

Hundreds of Covid countermeasures contracts have been uncovered. Many disclosures are in redacted form. However, Latypova and Watt have found sources to fill in the details. A review of these contracts indicates a high degree of control by the US Government (DoD/BARDA). It specifies the scope of deliverables as “demonstrations” and “prototypes” only while excluding clinical trials and manufacturing quality control from the scope of work paid for by the contracts. To ensure that Pharma is free to conduct fake clinical trials without financial risk, the contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation.

Why is no action by regulators or courts? According to Latypova and Watt, a combination of recently passed legislation and executive orders make it LEGAL to LIE! The HHS Secretary is accountable to no one if the Health National Emergency continues to be extended by Congress every three months.

A significant information operation was set in motion the minute Covid-19 hit. The US government, the intelligence community, the media, and Big Tech colluded to orchestrate and implement an intense pressure campaign designed to get the vaccine legally designated under the Emergency Use Authorisation Act while vilifying dissenting doctors, critics, and viable alternative treatments. This designation allowed for speedy manufacturing devoid of the standard safety and public health protocols.

For a vaccine to receive designation under the EUA, there can be no other known treatments or cures. Therefore, many proven treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were blacklisted in the media and dismissed as “horse dewormers” when these cheap, readily available drugs were in the past heralded for their effectiveness.

Eminent Covid-treating doctors such as Peter M. McCullough and Pierre Kory have faced unprecedented attacks on their medical credentials.

HERE is a typical contract scope for “vaccines”.

• Altman P, Rowe J, Hoy WE, Brady G, Lefringhausen A, Cosford R, Wauchope B. Did National Security Imperatives Compromise Covid-19 Vaccine Safety?
• Australian Bureau of Statistics – Provisional Mortality Statistics reference period Jan – Aug 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/latest-release
• Altman Report – The Time of COVID: 9 Aug. 2022 https://amps.redunion.com.au/hubfs/Altman%20Report%20Version%209-8-22%20FINAL%20FINAL_%20(1).pdf. 
• BARDA — The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – 2022  https://www.medicalcountermeasures.gov/BARDA
• Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology.  Chapter 6 of the 2018 edition.
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Life Sciences; Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology; Committee on Strategies for Identifying and Addressing Potential Biodefense Vulnerabilities Posed by Synthetic Biology.Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018 Jun 19.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535870/
• Blaylock Report – The COVID-19 “Vaccines: What is the truth? International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research 21 Sept. 2022.  https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/57
• CDCa – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines updated Dec. 5 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html
• CDCb – Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) through December 2, 2022. Open VAERS data.  https://openvaers.com/covid-data
• Cosentino, M .and Marino, F.: Understanding the Pharmacology of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Playing Dice with the Spike?  Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810881
• Dopp, K. and Seneff, S: COVID-19 and All-Cause Mortality Data by Age Group Reveals Risk of COVID Vaccine-Induced Fatality is Equal to or Greater than the Risk of a COVID death for all Age Groups Under 80 Years Old as of 6 February 2022.  https://vixra.org/pdf/2202.0084v1.pdf
• FDA Announcement 2020
  https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-additional-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-second-covid
• FDA – US Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation — Operation Warp Speed – Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response – Unclassified Document from US FDA Website (hereinafter “FDA Presentation”) https://www.fda.gov/media/143560/download
• FDA August 2018: FDA approves first-of-its kind targeted RNA-based therapy to treat a rare disease.  https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-its-kind-targeted-rna-based-therapy-treat-rare-disease
• German Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis – Summary of Preliminary Findings – July 6, 2022.  https://guerrillatranscripts.substack.com/p/german-working-group-for-covid-vaccine
• Gutschi, M.: Quality Issues with mRNA Covid Vaccine Production. 2 Nov. 2022. https://www.bitchute.com/video/muB0nrznCAC4/
• Hughes, D.: What is in the so-called COVID-19 “Vaccines”? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity.  International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(2), September 3, 2022 Page 455 https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2
• International Conference on Harmonisation – https://www.ich.org/page/ich-guidelines
• Knowledge Ecology International (KEI) – COVID Contracts https://www.keionline.org/covid-contracts
• Latypova, S. – https://www.bitchute.com/video/BGIqC6ufcyjF/ Bitchute interview Oct. 25 2022
• McCullough, P: mRNA and DNA vector vaccines made by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) – 3speak.tv December 2022. https://3speak.tv/watch?v=rairfoundation/idclxvii
• Medical Defense Consortium – https://www.medcbrn.org/current-members/https://www.medcbrn.org/about-mcdc/
• Pfizer did not know whether Covid vaccine stopped transmission before rollout, executive admits. News.com.au October 13, 2022. https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414
• Open Letter from the Covid Medical Network (CMN) To Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Australian Federal Health Department. 8 March 2022 https://www.covidmedicalnetwork.com/open-letters/open-letter-to-atagi.aspx
• Prep ACT Immunity from liability for COVID-19 vaccinators.  US Dept. of Health and Human Services. March 2020. https://www.phe.gov/emergency/events/COVID19/COVIDVaccinators/Pages/PREP-Act-Immunity-from-Liability-for-COVID-19-Vaccinators.aspx
• Rees, H. and Latypova, S. Toxic by Design: Big Pharma experts speak out 22 Nov. 2022. https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/toxic-by-design-big-pharma-experts-speak-out
• Seneff, S. and Nigh, G.: Worse Than the Disease?  Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 2(1), May 10, 2021
• TGA provisionally approves Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 27 August 2021. https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/tga-provisionally-approves-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine
• Turni, C and Lefringhausen, A.: COVID-19 vaccines – an Australian Review. Journal of clinical and Experimental Immunology, Vol. 7, Issue 3, p491. 21 Sept. 2022. https://doi.org/10.33140/jcei.07.03.03
• US Dept. of Defense Plan – Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova – 4 Nov. 2022 https://zeeemedia.com/interview/uncensored-bombshell-team-enigma-whistleblower-us-dod-plan-to-exterminate-population-sasha-latypova/
• Watt, K. and Latypova, S. – November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1sjz4u-discussion-with-Katherine-Watt- regarding-American-domestic- bioterrorism-pro.html 
• The Military Operations Research Response to COVID-19, June 2021 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27029399