[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” text_font_size=”18px” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
Everyone seems to be preoccupied with all this Left \/ Right, He Said \/ She Said Paradigm. So here is something that changes that whole Argument into the realm of the Insane. This post is not for the faint of heart so if you like your cage skip this post.<\/p>\n
OK, Warnings complete and you are still here. Lets continue shall we?<\/p>\n
What is Citizenship made of or put a different way how is it defined and what is it for allegedly?<\/p>\n
We Are Told Citizenship Is Reciprocal In Nature, I Give You This And You Give Me That.<\/p>\n
Allegiance for Protection otherwise It is a Protection Racket (Protection against your will at gun point)<\/p>\n
Why can’t you sue the police when your car is stolen or worse yet your wife calls 911 and is on hold with police for 45 minutes. Yes they never showed up and the woman died after being raped while the phone was off the hook. The husbands case was thrown out for lack of standing. Why you ask, BECAUSE THERE IS NO DUTY TO PROTECT ANYONE, Yes you read that correctly. You can’t hold anyone accountable because you don’t have standing to sue. So if your car is stolen and you pay the police to protect your stuff, shouldn’t they be held responsible when they fail in their duty to protect you or your property? Not if there is no such thing as a duty on their part.<\/p>\n
We call this a Protection Racket in Reality.<\/p>\n
What are the ramifications of this?<\/p>\n
No Such Thing As A Citizen, Illegal Alien, Alien, State, Nation, Country. The reality is just a bunch of men and women controlling \/ protecting you against you free will. This is the definition of Racketeering. Wic vs. Woo Case the Judge said to be under the will of another is the essence of slavery.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” text_font_size=”16px” header_2_text_color=”#E02B20″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
In order for you to understand the full import of what is happening, I must explain certain laws to you.<\/p>\n
When passing new statutes, the Federal government always does everything according to the principles of law. In order for the Federal Government to tax a Citizen of one of the several states, they had to create some sort of contractual nexus. This contractual nexus is the “Social Security Number”.<\/p>\n
In 1935, the federal government instituted Social Security.<\/p>\n
The Social Security Board then created 10 Social Security “Districts”. The combination of these “Districts” resulted in a “Federal area” which covered all the several states like a clear plastic overlay.<\/p>\n
In 1939, the federal government instituted the “Public Salary Tax Act of 1939”. This Act is a municipal law of the District of Columbia for taxing all federal and state government employees and those who live and work in any “Federal area”.<\/p>\n
Now, the government knows it cannot tax those state Citizens who live and work outside the territorial jurisdiction of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 (1:8:17) or Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the U.S. Constitution. So, in 1940, Congress passed the “Buck Act”, 4 U.S.C.S. Sections 105-113. In Section 110(e), this Act authorized any department of the federal government to create a “Federal area” for imposition of the “Public Salary Tax Act of 1939”. This tax is imposed at 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 111. The rest of the taxing law is found in the Internal Revenue Code. The Social Security Board had already created a “Federal area” overlay.<\/p>\n
4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d). The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.<\/p>\n
4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(e). The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.<\/p>\n
There is no reasonable doubt that the federal “State” is imposing an excise tax under the provisions of 4 U.S.C.S. Section 105, which states in pertinent part:<\/p>\n
Sec. 105. State, and so forth, taxation affecting Federal areas; sales or use tax<\/p>\n
(a) No person shall be relieved from liability for payment of, collection of, or accounting for any sales or use tax levied by any State, or by any duly constituted taxing authority therein, having jurisdiction to levy such tax, on the ground that the sale or use, with respect to which such tax is levied, occurred in whole or in part within a Federal area; and such State or taxing authority shall have full jurisdiction and power to levy and collect any such tax in any Federal area within such State to the same extent and with the same effect as though such area was not a Federal area.<\/p>\n
Irrespective of what the tax is called, if its purpose is to produce revenue, it is an income tax or a receipts tax under the Buck Act [4 U.S.C.A. Secs. 105-110]. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Calvert, 464 SW 2d. 170 (1971), affd (Tex) 478 SW 2d. 926, cert. den. 409 U.S. 967, 34 L.Ed. 2d. 234, 93 S.Ct. 293.<\/p>\n
Thus, the obvious question arises: What is a “Federal area”?<\/p>\n
A “Federal area” is any area designated by any agency, department, or establishment of the federal government. This includes the Social Security areas designated by the Social Security Administration, any public housing area that has federal funding, a home that has a federal bank loan, a road that has federal funding, and almost everything that the federal government touches through any type of aid. Springfield v. Kenny, 104 N.E. 2d 65 (1951 App.). This “Federal area” attaches to anyone who has a Social Security Number or any personal contact with the federal or state governments. Through this mechanism, the federal government usurped the Sovereignty of the People, as well as the Sovereignty of the several states, by creating “Federal areas” within the boundaries of the states under the authority of Article 4, Section 3, Clause 2 (4:3:2) in the federal Constitution, which states:<\/p>\n
Therefore, all U.S. citizens [i.e. citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the Union, are classified as property, as franchisees of the federal government, and as an “individual entity”. See Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773. Under the “Buck Act”, 4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113, the federal government has created a “Federal area” within the boundaries of all the several states.<\/p>\n
This area is similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial law upon all people in this “Federal area”. Federal territorial law is evidenced by the Executive Branch’s yellow-fringed U.S. flag flying in schools, offices and all courtrooms.<\/p>\n
You must live on land in one of the states in the Union of several states, not in any “Federal State” or “Federal area”, nor can you be involved in any activity that would make you subject to “federal laws”. You cannot have a valid Social Security Number, a “resident” driver’s license, a motor vehicle registered in your name, a “federal” bank account, a Federal Register Account Number relating to Individual persons [SSN], (see Executive Order Number 9397, November 1943), or any other known “contract implied in fact” that would place you within any “Federal area” and thus within the territorial jurisdiction of the municipal laws of Congress. Remember, all acts of Congress are territorial in nature and only apply within the territorial jurisdiction of Congress. (See American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, 356-357 (1909); U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217, 222, 94 L.Ed. 3, 70 S.Ct. 10 (1949); New York Central R.R. Co. v. Chisholm, 268 U.S. 29, 31-32, 69 L.Ed. 828, 45 S.Ct. 402 (1925).)<\/p>\n
There has been created a fictional Federal “State within a state”. See Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953); Schwartz v. O’Hara TP. School Dist., 100 A. 2d. 621, 625, 375 Pa. 440. (Compare also 31 C.F.R. Parts 51.2 and 52.2, which also identify a fictional State within a state.) This fictional “State” is identified by the use of two-letter abbreviations like “CA”, “AZ” and “TX”, as distinguished from the authorized abbreviations like “Calif.”, “Ariz.” and “Tex.”, etc. This fictional State also uses ZIP codes which are within the municipal, exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress.<\/p>\n
\u00a0This entire scheme was accomplished by passage of the “Buck Act”, 4 U.S.C.S. Secs. 105-113, to implement the application of the “Public Salary Tax Act of 1939” to workers within the private sector. This subjects all private sector workers who have a Social Security number to all state and federal laws “within this State”, a “fictional Federal area” overlaying the land in California and in all other states in the Union. In California, this is established by California Form 590, Revenue and Taxation.<\/p>\n
All you have to do is to state that you live in California. This establishes that you do not live in a “Federal area” and that you are exempt from the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939 and also from the California Income Tax for residents who live “in this State”.<\/p>\n
The following definition is used throughout the several states in the application of their municipal laws which require some sort of contract for proper application. This definition is also included in all the codes of California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah and New York:<\/p>\n
“In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State … and includes all territories within such limits owned or ceded to the United States of America.<\/p>\n
This definition concurs with the “Buck Act” supra which states:<\/p>\n
110(d) The term “State” includes any Territory or possession of the United States.<\/p>\n
110(e) The term “Federal area” means any lands or premises held or acquired by or for the use of the United States or any department, establishment, or agency of the United States; and any Federal area, or any part thereof, which is located within the exterior boundaries of any State, shall be deemed to be a Federal area located within such State.<\/p>\n
So, do some research. I have given you all the proper directions in which to look for the jurisdictional nexus that places you within the purview of the federal government.<\/p>\n
\u00a0Fact Check All You Want, I Beg You!<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ _module_preset=”default” text_font_size=”16px” header_2_text_color=”#E02B20″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]<\/p>\n
The government founded by the original Constitution, 1787, is no longer publicly\/generally operational.\u00a0\u00a0 Instead, what is called the \u201cGovernment of the United States\u201d is a bankrupt, private corporation, owned, underwritten, and functioning in commerce as a front for the international bankers and the Powers-That-Be with which said bankers are allied.\u00a0 The entire institution, i.e., \u201cUS Inc.,\u201d is private (not free<\/u>) enterprise administering the ongoing business and political goals of the actual owners.\u00a0 In this current scenario, every action of US Inc. is a commercial transaction by and between fictitious entities all transpiring for the purpose of furthering the economic and political objectives of the alleged creditors.<\/p>\n In accordance, inter alia<\/em>, with the Limited Liability Act<\/em> of 1851, the Emergency War Powers<\/em>, 12 Stat. 319, the Civil Rights Act<\/em> of 1866, and the constitutional provision allowing Congress authority to pass any law Congress wishes within the ten-mile square territory of Washington, DC and its territories and possessions, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, the 14th Amendment<\/em> was proclaimed ratified in 1868.\u00a0 Within that framework, on February 21st<\/sup>, 1871, Congress passed the District of Columbia Organic Act<\/em>, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, 16 Stat. 419, \u201cAn Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,<\/em>\u201d which act was revised in 1874 and reorganized June 8, 1878, 20 Stat. 102, Chap 180, 45th<\/sup> Congress, 2nd<\/sup> Session, \u201cAn Act providing a permanent form of government for the District of Columbia.<\/em>\u201d This \u201cgovernment\u201d is a private corporation copyrighted and known by such names as \u201cThe United States Government,\u201d \u201cUnited States,\u201d \u201cU.S.,\u201d \u201cU.S.A.,\u201d etc., all referenced herein as \u201cUS Inc.\u201d\u00a0 It is important to understand that US Inc. is not a country<\/u>, but a corporation<\/u>\u2014and indeed a bankrupt corporation operating under color of government as the front and device for administering the conquest in law and commerce of the United States of America.\u00a0 The 14th<\/sup> Amendment and US Inc. are all private international law in the admiralty-maritime\/Law Merchant of Roman Civil Law, accomplishing in this country what had beset in England.<\/p>\n The 14th Amendment states: \u201cAll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.\u201d This amendment allows US Inc. to have complete jurisdiction over \u201ccitizens,\u201d i.e., corporate subsets of US Inc., which the de jure<\/em> federal government did not and could not possess.\u00a0 The 14th Amendment also states (section 4): \u201cThe validity of the public debt of the United States authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion [per 12 Stat. 319], shall not be questioned.\u201d\u00a0 The 14th<\/sup> Amendment established the framework for complete conquest and absorption of the country, rendering all citizens permanent debtors, indentured servants in involuntary servitude and peonage.\u00a0 As enemies of the government in accordance with 12 State 319, any aspect of US Inc. may summarily confiscate property in rem without necessity for judicial process whenever any citizen asserts a challenge to the private laws of the corporate United States, i.e., US Inc.<\/p>\n Remnants of the de jure<\/em> Government remained after the 14th<\/sup> Amendment, however, based on such things as the continuing circulation of gold and silver coin (the money of sovereigns as movable allodial title) and the fact that Senators were still elected to the Senate by Electors of the States rather than by direct, popular vote.\u00a0 Senators became elected by direct vote of the people with the passage of the 17th<\/sup> Amendment.<\/p>\n Because additional pledging of assets was required to enable the now-bankrupt corporation to continue to operate when civilly dead, the governors of all the States met to discuss the \u201cemergency\u201d declared by Franklin D. Roosevelt, i.e., the bankruptcy, and how to reorganize US Inc. to continue functioning when bankrupt by means of insurance underwriting by the creditors.<\/p>\n At the Conference of Governors on March 6, 1933, the governors of the forty-eight (48) States made a \u201cpledge\u201d to US Inc. to underwrite the bankruptcy through a grand scheme of limited-liability insurance.[2]<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 The people, through their \u201cCertificates of Live Birth\u201d registered in the States, were pledged assets to the federal bankruptcy and the people\u2019s energy was thereby established as the collateral for backing the whole operation\u2014the entire fraudulent national debt.\u00a0 Since the States, being fictitious, commercial entities with no capacity to bind real beings, could not pledge private, living people or their property, a \u201cbridge\u201d was needed between the living people and the bankruptcy.\u00a0 To accomplish this result a new legal fiction was created in the form of the people\u2019s name in all-capital letters, which then functioned as a \u201cstrawman,\u201d i.e., a shill put out front to operate publicly in place of the people.\u00a0 The scheme had to be so clever that the people would agree to operate as surety for the debts, charges, and obligations of the strawman without truly knowing what was happening to them, who did it, what they were agreeing to, or how the whole process worked.<\/p>\n When the governors made the pledge, they agreed to register the State-issued birth certificates of the people (which was all the States had a right to pledge, since they had no claim on the real people per se) with the U.S. Department of Commerce.\u00a0 The birth certificate is a bill of lading, a document of bailment, signed by the delivering mother and witness (usually the Doctor), which ships the cargo (birth certificate) into the special (private) maritime jurisdiction of the creditors where it operates as the security instrument (collateral) used to back the pledge. The strawman, the legal fiction, was created by the Federal Department of Commerce by fabricating a new birth certificate using the name on the State-issued birth certificate but changing the spelling to all-capital letters.\u00a0 This all-caps legal fiction, the \u201cstrawman,\u201d is \u201cbirthed\u201d\u2014like a vessel\u2014into the private, international-law domain of the bankers, et al, as a \u201ccitizen of the United States born [birthed] or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.\u201d\u00a0 Thereby living people assumed the roll of representative, guarantor, accommodation party, and surety for the legal fiction that functioned for the benefit and enrichment of the creditors.\u00a0 In this scheme the strawman, not the living being, is what operates throughout the entirety of today\u2019s law and commerce.\u00a0 One need only look at the Social Security Card, School Records, Passports, Driver\u2019s Licenses, credit cards, utility bills, etc., all of which are always in all-capital letters\u2014just as are gravestones of dead people all over the world\u2014to see the ubiquitous use of the strawman in today\u2019s commercial and legal world.<\/p>\n A \u201csurety\u201d is defined as \u201cthe one who is responsible to pay.\u201d\u00a0 The real man is the surety and liable by contract to pay for the debts and obligations of the strawman, even though the real man does not own, nor does he receive title to, nor does he have any claim on anything purchased or accomplished by use of the strawman.\u00a0 The strawman is owned by the banks that purchased US Inc. bonds raised against the strawman\u2019s birth certificate.<\/p>\n As stated, US Inc. is bankrupt, and the most recent, flagrant and dramatic reorganization occurred in 1933 with the New Deal.\u00a0 US Inc. had no gold or silver to pay its debts to the bankers, and, as an insolvent corporation, became civilly dead.\u00a0 Having neither possession, nor right of possession, nor legal capacity to use gold and silver, i.e., \u201clawful money,\u201d the only asset left to finance the continued operation of the bankrupt US Inc., i.e., the \u201cgovernment,\u201d was the citizens of the United States, i.e., citizens of US Inc., who were hypothecated as the credit\/collateral to finance the bankruptcy reorganization and insurance underwriting.\u00a0 US Inc. uses the substance and labor of the people, as citizens, to finance its entire operation, hence the need for ultimate control.\u00a0 Fiat and force replaced substance and freedom.<\/p>\n The resulting scenario is extremely sophisticated, involving in the operation of a vast and pervasive administration of legalized peonage, slavery, permanent indentured servitude, and collectivism (communism) wherein the people have forfeited all standing in law and are \u201cdead to rights.\u201d\u00a0 If you are deemed a citizen of the United States, you are an asset pledge to the bankruptcy, on the basis of which the Powers-That-Be borrow against your life, rights, and labor to finance their administration of the system they use to exploit, plunder, and dominate you, all under the pretext\/presumption that they are acting as your agents to fulfill your own requests in the Democracy.\u00a0 In this scheme, by your own presumed pre-agreement as a citizen of the corporation, you are punished when you fail to pay or obey.<\/p>\n The sequence of steps involved in creating the existing system, in accordance with the best research to date (resulting from the efforts of many devoted people), is as follows in the United States:<\/p>\n The private, international law that governs the legal\/commercial system today is the Uniform Commercial Code, which was recognized as the law of the land in the United States in Public Laws 88-243 and 88-244.\u00a0 This established the entire legal, banking, and monetary system under the UCC, which is private, not public, law.\u00a0 The UCC is copyrighted, private law of UNIDROIT, an Italian corporation out of the Vatican.<\/p>\n Now the people, via their all-caps names, are classified as \u201chuman resources,\u201d and “goods” under the Uniform Commercial Code\u2014see Section 2-105(1) and 9-105(1) in which animals, i.e. humans and their unborn offspring, become “goods” saleable in commerce.<\/p>\n The Department of Treasury issues bonds on the birth certificates, which are sold through securities exchanges and purchased\u2014by extending credit on the bank\u2019s books\u2014by the Federal Reserve Bank, which uses the bonds as \u201creserves\u201d for creating credit in the fractional reserve system.\u00a0 The people\u2019s labor becomes the collateral for issuing Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of “debt obligation” (see 18 USC \u00a7411).\u00a0 The bonds are held in trust for the purchaser, now the \u201csecured party\u201d and holder in due course, at the Resolution Trust Company at 55 Water Street, in New York City, about two blocks down the street from the Federal Reserve. It is a high-rise office building with a sign that reads, “The Tower of Power.”<\/p>\n After the New Deal (Governors Pledge) the all-caps name, i.e., \u201cstrawman,\u201d is what the system deals with, since it cannot interface directly with real beings.\u00a0 The real being, however, is presumed to have ratified the deal, agreed to the pledge, by the three (3) means for signifying ratification of implied contracts[4]<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0 Thereafter, the system functions on the basis of possessing complete authority to do anything it wishes with the strawman, which is its own creation and property and does not belong to the living being to whom the strawman purportedly pertains.<\/p>\n This scheme of legal\/commercial peonage and slavery is outside the Constitution, which does not apply in any matters concerning the resulting process.\u00a0 The system functions in the realm of private contract, private international law, in international commerce, i.e., the private international law of the private, colorable Law Merchant, not within the direct purview of the Constitution, which merely sanctifies the operational right to contract.<\/p>\n Thereafter, every time the real being signs his name on any legal\/commercial document, he is creating<\/u> more debt-currency into existence, signing as the \u201csurety,\u201d or \u201caccommodation party\u201d per the Uniform commercial Code \u00a73-415.\u00a0 He is also placing title to whatever property is involved in the hands of the bond-holder.<\/p>\n In this scenario, the “name,” i.e., strawman, is credit and is a constructive cestui que<\/em> trust (trust created by operation of law, i.e., fiat) holding all the real assets, i.e., \u201csweat-equity,\u201d created by the labor of the real being.\u00a0 The right to the use has been separated from the title. The “strawman” holds the title and belongs to the bond-holder, not the real being.\u00a0 The flesh-and-blood man or women has only naked possession with a limited “right” (privilege) to use the thing, such as one\u2019s body, possessions, or land.\u00a0 Such illusion of ownership and right is essential to maintain the sting on an ongoing basis, keep the people from completely rebelling if their status as accommodation\/surety slaves was self-evident, and fostering more enthusiasm to work and produce by thinking that they are doing so for their own benefit rather than for the enrichment and power of their owners\/masters\/rulers.<\/p>\n When the strawman violates some rule or statute, such as is presumed whenever the strawman receives a traffic ticket, the flesh-and-blood being must appear at an arraignment and admit that he is the surety and accommodation party for the strawman, and thereby agree to provide the “energy” necessary for providing whatever fine or penalty is deemed due and payable.\u00a0 The real being has re-confirmed the contract of implied unification of the real being with the strawman by saying \u201chere\u201d when the strawman\u2019s name is called in the idem sonans<\/em>, i.e., \u201csame-sound,\u201d private\/commercial\/trust tribunal.[5]<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 This is why it essential for the operation of the system that people “voluntarily give” their names to the court.\u00a0 The \u201cDefendant\u201d in the action is the strawman, not the real being. The real being confirms that he is, or may legally be treated the same as, the Defendant.\u00a0 Through this process one has entered through a door over which is inscribed: \u201cAbandon hope all ye who enter here.\u201d<\/p>\n It is now clear that the strawman is:<\/p>\n It is important to remember that the strawman is not<\/u> the property of the real being.\u00a0 The living man or woman is merely the surety (sucker) providing the labor, life-energy, and sweat-equity for the fiction owned by US Inc. and the bond-holder.\u00a0 The strawman is the front that enables the secured party to act in legal\/commercial dealings without revealing his identity, and to deceive the real being, who signs in all matters as a surety and accommodation party, into thinking that the real being is doing something for himself rather than his owners\/masters.\u00a0 Everything the real being signs on behalf of the strawman places title to whatever property is involved into the hands of the United States and the bond owner, i.e., the secured party over the strawman.<\/p>\n There is a sequence of steps that must be done\u2014properly and in sequence\u2014to become free of the bondage-system that now enslaves mankind, and regain lost freedom and independence.\u00a0 The system has not, to say the least, been forthcoming in informing the people concerning the true legal and commercial situation to which virtually everyone in the world is now subject.[6]<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 If full disclosure, good faith, and genuine meeting of the minds prevailed, as is required for any purported contract to be an actual, bona fide contract enforceable at law, and the people knew the truth, the banks and governments of the world would be out of business.\u00a0 It has been a long, dangerous, often ruinous road\u2014involving the blood, sweat, tears, property, and even the lives of many people\u2014to uncover the nature of the clever scheme.\u00a0 Such people, most of whom not only love freedom and truth but principle for its own sake, have not been willing to remain in ignorance and bondage, and have diverted their lives to the task of understanding the nature of the system and ascertaining ways to become free of it.<\/p>\n III. Remedy and recourse<\/p>\n The real man has no remedy or rights protected the organic Constitution because the commercial process operates entirely in the realm of private contract and private law between legal fictions, i.e., strawmen, outside the Constitution.\u00a0 Today\u2019s operational jurisdiction is private<\/u> law, called \u201cpublic policy,\u201d not public<\/u> law as existed in the Republic.\u00a0 To make his way in the world a living being, who cannot enter, operate in, or be directly interacted with in the realm of the fictitious and imaginary, needs a commercial vessel.\u00a0 Such a vessel is the strawman.<\/p>\n Inasmuch as law must always provide a remedy, when US Inc. declared bankruptcy it had to structure a means for living people to appear in their private, proper capacity and deal with whatever claims might arise.\u00a0 The result is that all claims must be resolved first through private administrative process to determine whether or not the public sector (public policy) has jurisdiction in a given matter.\u00a0 Consequently, in order properly to bring or deal with an action in the public sector, the private, administrative remedies must properly be exhausted first.\u00a0 The real being must first perfect his claim before asserting any standing as creditor.<\/p>\n Inasmuch as all courts today are admiralty-equity tribunals, the universal principles of equity are operational.\u00a0 This includes such maxims of equity as:<\/p>\n If, in an action, both parties are in dishonor, both have failed to \u201cgive equity\u201d and have proceeded with \u201cunclean hands.\u201d\u00a0 In such case the judge has unbridled discretion, since he is dealing with two losers from inception.\u00a0 The judge must then do what his exclusive duty is in any case, which is to uphold public policy and collect revenue for paying the insurance policy premiums to keep the bankrupt corporation afloat.<\/p>\n The trick, therefore, is never to dishonor, i.e., always do equity and act with clean hands, and perfect your claim in the private, administrative realm.\u00a0 By so doing, you have availed yourself of the remedy in law and \u201cexhausted your administrative remedies.\u201d\u00a0 At this point, if the matter should enter a court and is put before a judge, you will be the one with a perfected claim on the private side and also the only party with clean hands, having done equity and acted in honor and good faith.<\/p>\n Because administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to a matter entering the judicial arena, as long as you are doing administrative procedure, the public officials cannot proceed with any court action against the strawman.<\/p>\n The administrative process consists of having your notary send (you should always send and receive all paperwork by and through a friendly and knowledgeable notary) notice of your position to all of the parties, i.e., \u201cRespondents,\u201d who are assaulting your strawman with demands, obligations, and charges.\u00a0 Said Respondents are sent your private, administrative notices in the private capacity of all concerned, so that you are operating as a real being sending notices to other real beings.\u00a0 The nature of your paperwork is that without dishonoring (denying, traversing, fault-finding, etc.), you require that your adversary \u201cput up or shut up\u201d without telling him he is wrong.\u00a0 In other words, you send them conditional acceptances and negative averments that in essence state:<\/p>\n \u201cI have no idea whether your claims and charges are bona fide or not, or whether I have an actual obligation to discharge the obligations you assert, but I am not aware of any evidence supporting your position in any of these matters and if you claim that your demands are valid, provide documentary proof of claim for the record substantiating your declarations, claims, and charges, and I will comply with whatever you prove.\u201d<\/p>\n It is essential to remember that the entire current judicial system functions by stipulations, i.e., agreements, between disputing parties.\u00a0 Stipulations occur either by the two parties openly agreeing on a particular point or, if they do not, the discovery and trial process resulting in stipulations based on the ruling of the judge, i.e., the \u201cconscience of the court.\u201d<\/p>\n The entire legal\/commercial process today is a game, the essential rule of which is: \u201cWhoever dishonors first loses.\u201d\u00a0 Or, phrased differently, \u201cNo one who dishonors can be assured of prevailing.\u201d\u00a0 In short, if you wish to win you must proceed without dishonoring, or there is no guarantee you will prevail and, what is worse, if your adversary is the system itself, you are automatically guaranteed to lose because the judge must faithfully adhere to his Prime Directive: Uphold public policy and collect revenue for the bankruptcy reorganization.<\/p>\n Your private administrative process must operate as follows:<\/p>\n Their stipulations that you have established by the foregoing process include their admission and confession, i.e., \u201cconfession of judgment,\u201d that:<\/p>\n After completion of the above, you can file your administrative judgment with the County Recorder, and thereafter record a certified copy of the filed judgment on a UCC-1 or UCC-3.<\/p>\n Remember that your notary constitutes a third party, a disinterested witness.\u00a0 When the notary, an agent of the court, enters the public side with your private information, your position appears on the public record.<\/p>\n Thereafter, any form of court action would constitute self-validating proof, based on the public record that has been established, that any and all involved parties\u2014including any judges\u2014are acting inequitably and with unclean hands. If you have any form of court proceeding asserted against you thereafter you can provide the public\/statutory court with a letter rogatory from your private court\u2014the court of the sovereign (as a sovereign, which you always are in private\/real capacity, you are your own court)\u2014and provide the judge with certified, true copy of your perfected claim on the public record on the basis of which any further action against you concerning the matter is not only void but actionable against all parties involved.\u00a0 You neither go into court (which would imply that you are a debtor, citizen of the United States, and admitting that a dispute exists after it has been stipulated on the record as not existing), nor move the court for anything.\u00a0 Doing any of these things merely proves to the judge that you don\u2019t know what you\u2019re doing.\u00a0 Just show the judge that he has only one course of action based on the record.<\/p>\n Once the above process has been undertaken, then all manner of remedies and recourses exist for you that formerly did not and could not.\u00a0 These include a habeas corpus, criminal affidavits, maritime liens, and other remedies, with stipulations that the public officials had no jurisdiction or authority to act as they did, and have proceeded against you in mere private capacity, without immunity.<\/p>\n \u00a0[1]<\/span><\/a> There is a difference between \u201cmartial law\u201d and \u201cmartial-law rule.\u201d\u00a0 The former involves overt rule by military officials, with troops in the streets, curfews, and the like.\u00a0 The latter consists of out-front civilian rule within a jurisdiction that is intrinsically military.\u00a0 Martial-law rule can, at any instant and under any pretense, transform into full-fledged martial law.<\/p>\n [2]<\/span><\/a> On March 6, 1933 at the \u201cConference of Governors,\u201d the Governors of the (then forty-eight (48)) several states of the Union, pledged their \u201cfull faith and credit\u201d as accommodation parties for the Federal Bankruptcy, and thereafter formed numerous socialist programs such as the \u201cCouncil of State Governments,\u201d Social Security Administration, etc.<\/em>, purportedly to deal with the economic \u201cEmergency.\u201d\u00a0 The scheme operated under the \u201cDeclaration of Interdependence\u201d of January 22, 1937.\u00a0 Some of their activities were published in the \u201cBook of the States,\u201d Vol. II, page 144.<\/p>\n The jurisdiction of the \u201cUnited States\u201d (inc.) is signified by the phrases \u201cin this state,\u201d \u201cthis State\u201d and the like, by two capital-letter federal postal designations (CA, NY, TX, FL, etc.<\/em>), or by a five-digit ZIP (Zone Improvement) Code.\u00a0 The phrase, \u201cin this state,\u201d is a catch-all term for everything and every agency within the Federal Zone, and is found in Senate Document No. 43, 73rd<\/sup> Congress, 1st<\/sup> Session, District of Columbia, United States, and referenced three (3) times in UCC 1-105.<\/p>\n [3]<\/span><\/a> In clarification of this assertion, the original Emergency War Powers<\/em> of 1861, 12 Stat. 319, not only has never been repealed, but is the foundation for subsequent acts, such as the Trading With the Enemy Act<\/em> of October 6, 1917, and the Amendatory Act<\/em> thereto, i.e., the \u201cBanking Relief Act,\u201d of March 9, 1933.\u00a0 The Amendatory Act<\/em> (48 Stat. 1), amending the Trading With the Enemy Act<\/em>, was passed by Congress just after Roosevelt’s Inauguration at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foe.\u00a0 The American people, however, were (unknowingly) at war with their conquerors, the Banksters, who had defeated the country by the treachery of their something-for-nothing paper-money banking swindle and other deceits, rather than force of arms.\u00a0 The pen can indeed be mightier (and more suicidal for those who mindlessly use it) than the sword.\u00a0 This amended version of the Trading With the Enemy Act<\/em> provided “legal” justification for dramatic increases in the power, scope, and authority of the U.S. Government (now owned by and an administrative agency of the bankers).<\/p>\n The original Trading with the Enemy Act<\/em> had specifically excluded<\/u> citizens of the United States from being regarded as the enemy when involved in transactions wholly within the United States.\u00a0 The Amendatory Act<\/em> of March 9, 1933, however, expressly included<\/u> the people of the United States as the enemy by insertion of the following text: “…by any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof…” Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 1(b).<\/p>\n By operation of law (private law of the 14th<\/sup> Amendment trust) the American people became the “enemy” of the private Federal Reserve\/IMF Creditors in bankruptcy, who have thereafter been administering their prize\/conquest through their alter ego and front, the “U.S. Government.”\u00a0 To regulate and control their chattel property the bankers, et al, rendered (under color of law and government) all intercourse illegal amongst the American people without obtaining permission through licensing.\u00a0 Commerce is illegal between belligerents, who, as enemies, are regarded as devoid of rights.\u00a0 To travel, a driver’s license is required; to open a business requires a business license (not to mention additional and on-going mountains of “red tape”); to work for another one must obtain licensing through a Social Security card.<\/p>\n To be “within the United States” one must merely be a “person” or “resident,” i.e., a 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”\u00a0 Although one can never know who actually knows what, the chances are overwhelmingly large that the vast majority of doctors and hospital personnel are as ignorant of how badly they\u2019ve been had as the mother of a newborn baby and the rest of the country.\u00a0 Part of the cleverness of the sting is that it has been structured so that the people are duped into policing and being policed by each other without ever knowing whose agenda they are actually fulfilling.\u00a0 It is possible that Henry Ford was correct in his celebrated comment: “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”<\/p>\n [4]<\/span><\/a> The three means of ratifying an implied contract, i.e., a unilateral offer from the system to you, are: 1) Do nothing; 2) Accept benefits from the system; 3) Fail to know, declare, and properly notice the appropriate parties in the system of your applicable law that is other than theirs.<\/p>\n [5]<\/span><\/a> A given name sounds the same when spoken, regardless of whether the spelling on paper consists of all-capital letters (the strawman) or upper- and lower-case letters (symbolically representing the real being).<\/p>\n [6]<\/span><\/a> The nature of the existing scenario is not, for instance, on the curriculum of any institution of public education, nor is it discussed in the media, news, law schools, etc.<\/p>\nThis situation arose from the borrowing by USA from European central banks and owing the unpaid indebtedness to the Crown from the original joint-venture agreement(s) between the Colonies (which are corporations of the Crown) and the Crown per se.\u00a0 It appears as though USA has been bankrupt\u2014certainly, at least, in debt\u2014from inception, i.e., from 1788, and the Constitution was drafted by the framers as \u201cconstitutors\u201d to \u201cre-constitute\u201d the unpaid debt and structure an organization for functioning in ongoing indebtedness.<\/h4>\n
The Civil War was staged and financed by the bankers and the Crown to conquer the nation by engaging in the timeless strategy of \u201cdivide and conquer.\u201d\u00a0 Pitting North against South resulted in the usurpation and transformation of the central government, i.e., Washington, D.C., from operating in accordance with the organic Constitution to functioning in the international, private, commercial, military jurisdiction of the Emergency War Powers as an instrumentality of the bankers, et al.\u00a0 The States were drawn into the Central Government, as were\u2014progressively\u2014the people directly by means of each individual ratifying the implied contract unilaterally offered by the Federal Government operating in\/from the new jurisdiction.\u00a0 The whole conglomerate thereafter operated in the Emergency War Powers of 12 Stat. 319, 1861, under the \u201claw of necessity,\u201d martial-law rule.[1]<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 Thus, the \u201cGovernment\u201d functions under mere \u201ccolor (appearance only) of government\u201d with the President as acting dictator on behalf of the bankers under the President\u2019s capacity as Commander in Chief of the Military.\u00a0 I.e., when the seven (7) Southern States walked out of Congress on March 27, 1861, Congress\u2014and, indeed, the entire de jure Government of USA under the original Constitution\u2014dissolved based on absence of a Congressional quorum to adjourn and re-convene.\u00a0 The result is that the actual winner of the Civil War was neither the North nor the South, but the bankers who owned the Federal Government that defeated both North and South and absorbed and subserved the States into that new, private government as \u201cFederal Districts.\u201d<\/h4>\n
The Civil War had forced each sovereign State to pledge its assets as collateral and become surety and a cosigner for the defaulted Federal Government\u2019s debt to the bankers.\u00a0 This procedure was repeated in the 1933 bankruptcy, at which time gold and silver coin (substance) were outlawed as money for citizens of the United States (fictions).\u00a0 Inability to use gold and silver as money solidified the bankruptcy of US Inc. and foreclosed every such citizen from accessing real money for use in payment of debts, thereby denying access to sovereignty and protection of unalienable rights.\u00a0 US Inc. is completely devoid of rights, substance, standing in law, and sovereign character, as is every citizen of the United States.<\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n